On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 5:33:04 AM UTC+1, M.M. wrote:
> [...]
> Ciekawe jak się zachowa std::mt19937_64 w takim teście.


Wygląd na to, że std::mt19937_64 dwa testy przeszedł, jeden
co prawda z p-value równym 0.9984, ale przeszedł. Liczb w
obu testach było około 38mld.


Pozdrawiam


P.S.

Pierwszy test:
time ./frnd
rnd seed1: 1048344733
rnd seed2: 707250714
--------------------------------------
loops: 302514177
// kubełek std::mt19937_64 std::ranlux48 chi-square
0 183946412 183955260 0.425576871246
1 92094858 92080380 2.27640767773
2 22458053 22465964 2.785721592
3 3561951 3558532 3.28493912658
4 412856 413504 1.01547748027
5 37076 37688 9.93801740607
6 2788 2676 4.68759342302
7 172 162 0.617283950617
8 11 11 0
chi-square: 25.03101752753471722
chi-dist: 0.000599442989703091512
chi-dist-cum: 0.9984771823024356957
--------------------------------------

^C

real 518m3.047s
user 517m44.904s
sys 0m6.612s


Drugi test:
time ./frnd
rnd seed1: 1800537340
rnd seed2: 2132837258
--------------------------------------
loops: 301268993
// kubełek std::mt19937_64 std::ranlux48 chi-square
0 183192536 183166993 3.56202194683
1 91701620 91722424 4.7186543609
2 22376562 22380635 0.741235849653
3 3547901 3548389 0.0671132730938
4 410212 410556 0.288233517474
5 37260 37082 0.854430721105
6 2726 2730 0.00586080586081
7 163 176 0.960227272727
8 10 8 0.5
chi-square: 11.69777774763957802
chi-dist: 0.04807272058814565609
chi-dist-cum: 0.8347998915301052147
--------------------------------------

^C

real 510m57.016s
user 510m39.752s
sys 0m6.032s