On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:22:12 +0000 (UTC), Daniel Janus
<n...@d...pl> wrote:

>Dnia 14.04.2011 Wojciech Jaczewski <w...@o...pl> napisał/a:
>
>> Nawet jeśli nie jest to argument w dyskusji, warto pokazać ludzi, którzy nie
>> ulegli modzie i odnieśli sukces.
>
>Jeszcze Joe Armstrong, w wywiadzie z Peterem Seibelem w "Coders at Work":
>
> I think the lack of reusability comes in object-oriented languages,
> not in functional languages. Because the problem with object-oriented
> languages is they've got all the implicit environment that they carry
> around with them. You wanted a banana but what you got was a gorilla
> holding the banana and the entire jungle.
>
> If you have referentially transparent code, if you have pure functions--
> all the data comes in its input arguments and everything goes out and
> leaves no state behind--it's incredibly reusable.
>
>pozdrawiam,
>Daniel

Kompletny belkot. Tacy sa wlasnie "gurus".

A.L.