Re: lekka lustrzanka canona - EOS M albo EOS 100D vs EOS 30D.

eGospodarka.pl › Grupy › pl.rec.foto.cyfrowa › lekka lustrzanka canona - EOS M albo EOS 100D vs EOS 30D. › Re: lekka lustrzanka canona - EOS M albo EOS 100D vs EOS 30D.

X-Received: by 10.49.122.42 with SMTP id lp10mr71379qeb.17.1388741224908; Fri, 03 Jan
2014 01:27:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.122.42 with SMTP id lp10mr71379qeb.17.1388741224908; Fri, 03 Jan
2014 01:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!agh.edu.pl!news.agh.edu.pl!newsfeed2.atman.pl!newsfeed.
atman.pl!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!v6no723937igd.0!news-out.google.com!p7ni499
1qat.0!nntp.google.com!p15no57008873qaj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo
.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: pl.rec.foto.cyfrowa
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 01:27:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52c67ba2$0$2141$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
Complaints-To: g...@g...com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.120.188.1;
posting-account=JOtkwgoAAAA9ocXNwD7vxptlRFKa5e2C
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.120.188.1
References: <l9phef$g9b$1@speranza.aioe.org>
<52c1f3f9$0$2165$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<3...@g...com>
<52c22b88$0$2143$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<l9u0gv$iqs$1@node2.news.atman.pl>
<52c2ae37$0$2183$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<l9uj7f$63k$1@node2.news.atman.pl>
<52c2fd8c$0$2357$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<la3al6$nde$1@node2.news.atman.pl>
<52c67ba2$0$2141$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d...@g...com>
Subject: Re: lekka lustrzanka canona - EOS M albo EOS 100D vs EOS 30D.
From: XX YY <f...@g...com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:27:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.rec.foto.cyfrowa:900972
[ ukryj nagłówki ]
Bo w praktyce - jak dla mnie
>
> - te 500 g to jest nic.

pytanie bylo nie czy 500 gram graja role , czy nie , tylko jaki aparat kupic zeby
obnizyc ciezar o 500 gram bez spadku jakosci obrazu.