> A jak nie wiadomo o co chodzi, to chodzi o pieniądze.

Specjalnie się z tym nie kryli, to wypowiedź Toma Lianzy z X-Rite:

"- So, are you saying that, all things considered, and in your
judgment, the
EyeOne Display 2 is actually a finer instrument than the DTP94/Optix
XR?

- Absolutely not, both products have their pros and cons. I have
always been a technical "fan" of the DTP94 and the guys that designed
it. Now we're on the same team and that is a very good thing. I
can't talk about future products, but one should assume that we are
looking at what customers want, improvement in measurement accuracy,
speed and precision. My problem with the 94 was the quatization errors
and time of measurement. It would need some tweaks to work with a DDC
controlled-wide gamut display. It was also very expensive to make.
Remember that the product was designed after Sequel got purchased by
Gretag and Monoco was purchased by X-rite. The DTP 94 also had a
slightly wider field of view which gave it better mount dismount
repeatiblity, at the sake of usage on lower end displays. The major
problem with the device is that could not come down in price in a cost
competitive market place and the volumes did not indicate that there
would be any major improvements due to scale in market size."