-
1. Data: 2004-02-23 11:40:23
Temat: rozlegle zepsucie tpnet?
Od: Przemyslaw Frasunek <v...@p...na.niusy>
Pojawily sie wlasnie ogromne straty w szkielecie TPNET na drodze do
ATMANu, GTSu, Energisa i Netii:
Hostname %Loss Rcv Snt Last Best
Avg Worst
1. router.intercom.pl 0% 11 11 1 1
1 3
2. z-polpak.intercom.pl 0% 11 11 9 6
17 35
3. z.lub-ar2.do.lub-r1.tpnet.pl 0% 11 11 7 4
16 34
4. z.lub-r1.do.war-r3.tpnet.pl 0% 10 10 34 7
15 34
5. z.war-r3.do.war-r4.tpnet.pl 0% 10 10 40 7
20 40
6. do.war-ar9.z.war-r4.tpnet.pl 70% 3 10 34 9
17 34
7. 213.77.0.50 78% 2 10 12 12
17 21
8. ???
9. btc-a1-0-50.ipartners.pl 89% 1 10 11 11
11 11
10. www.ipartners.pl 80% 2 10 19 19
22 24
Hostname %Loss Rcv Snt Last Best
Avg Worst
1. router.intercom.pl 0% 9 9 1 1
1 1
2. z-polpak.intercom.pl 0% 9 9 21 5
12 21
3. z.lub-ar2.do.lub-r1.tpnet.pl 0% 9 9 13 4
11 21
4. z.lub-r1.do.war-r3.tpnet.pl 0% 9 9 18 8
16 40
5. z.war-r3.do.war-r4.tpnet.pl 0% 9 9 33 7
15 33
6. do.war-ar9.z.war-r4.tpnet.pl 78% 2 9 41 11
26 41
7. 195.116.0.154 86% 1 8 11 11
11 11
8. ???
9. ???
10. www.energis.pl 75% 2 8 12 12
16 19
Hostname %Loss Rcv Snt Last Best
Avg Worst
1. router.intercom.pl 0% 6 6 1 1
1 2
2. z-polpak.intercom.pl 0% 6 6 15 5
9 15
3. z.lub-ar2.do.lub-r1.tpnet.pl 0% 6 6 8 4
6 8
4. z.lub-r1.do.war-r3.tpnet.pl 0% 6 6 18 8
12 18
5. z.war-r3.do.war-r4.tpnet.pl 0% 6 6 10 8
11 17
6. ???
7. z.tpnet.do.inetia.tpnet.pl 60% 2 6 10 9
9 10
8. Netia-gw2-atm12-0-0.inetia.pl 80% 1 6 16 16
16 16
9. ???
10. 81.210.56.45 80% 1 6 16 16
16 16
--
* Fido: 2:480/124 ** WWW: http://www.frasunek.com/ ** NICHDL: PMF9-RIPE *
* JID: v...@j...atman.pl ** PGP ID: 2578FCAD ** HAM-RADIO: SQ8JIV *
-
2. Data: 2004-02-23 11:46:29
Temat: Re: rozlegle zepsucie tpnet?
Od: "mathom" <m...@p...pl>
Mi to wyglada raczej na przycinanie ICMP:
z NEO do netii :
-----
su-2.05b# traceroute www.netia.pl
traceroute to www.netia.pl (195.114.173.133), 64 hops max, 44 byte packets
1 poz-ru3.neo.tpnet.pl (213.25.2.37) 15.283 ms 16.457 ms 13.413 ms
2 213.25.5.197 (213.25.5.197) 12.678 ms 16.304 ms 13.425 ms
3 z.byd-r2.do.poz-r1.tpnet.pl (194.204.175.155) 14.697 ms 15.057 ms
14.967 ms
4 z.byd-r1.do.byd-r2.tpnet.pl (194.204.175.194) 15.833 ms 15.062 ms
14.651 ms
5 z.kat-r1.do.kra-r1.tpnet.pl (194.204.175.143) 20.619 ms 19.619 ms
20.133 ms
6 do.war-ar9.z.war-r4.tpnet.pl (213.25.12.60) 18.685 ms 21.028 ms
19.873 ms
7 z.tpnet.do.inetia.tpnet.pl (194.204.130.246) 20.057 ms 24.433 ms
55.839 ms
8 Netia-gw2-atm12-0-0.inetia.pl (195.114.190.229) 261.108 ms 189.055 ms
209.490 ms
9 Warszawa-gw1-fe3-1.inetia.pl (195.114.190.206) 22.276 ms 23.469 ms
22.067 ms
10 gateway.internetia.pl (195.114.161.48) 27.251 ms 24.011 ms 26.259 ms
11 lars.internetia.pl (195.114.173.133) 27.976 ms 27.272 ms 25.258 ms
----
z netii do tpnetu :
-bash-2.05b$ traceroute www.tpnet.pl
traceroute: Warning: www.tpnet.pl has multiple addresses; using 217.98.20.20
traceroute to www.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.20), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 router (213.17.226.65) 0.189 ms 0.306 ms 0.279 ms
2 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1) 0.902 ms 1.032 ms 1.038 ms
3 81.210.6.41 (81.210.6.41) 2.528 ms 1.317 ms 1.298 ms
4 PoznH002RT01-3-0-26.inetia.pl (62.148.72.65) 4.671 ms 7.048 ms 10.425
ms
5 Netia-gw4-fe5-0-0.inetia.pl (195.114.190.149) 7.774 ms 5.187 ms 5.006
ms
6 Netia-gw3-pos0-0-0.inetia.pl (195.114.190.165) 12.826 ms 17.909 ms
13.907
ms
7 Netia-gw2-pos0-1-0.inetia.pl (195.114.190.253) 18.281 ms 19.579 ms
19.935
ms
8 Piekna-gw1-atm2-0.inetia.pl (195.114.190.230) 20.934 ms 21.604 ms
24.471
ms
9 z.inetia.do.tpnet.pl (194.204.130.245) 21.434 ms 21.427 ms 21.991 ms
10 z.war-ar9.do.war-r4.tpnet.pl (213.25.12.61) 20.528 ms 25.765 ms
20.587 ms
11 z.war-r4.do.war-r3.tpnet.pl (194.204.175.225) 20.945 ms 21.077 ms
20.986
ms
12 do.war-ar8.z.war-r3.tpnet.pl (213.25.5.46) 21.110 ms 21.561 ms 21.811
ms
13 z.war-ar8.do.war-ar9.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.2) 23.805 ms 25.050 ms
24.158 ms
14 gaja.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.20) 23.262 ms 22.519 ms 25.674 ms
------
W gierkach nie ma zadnych packet lossów, a trasa idzie tez przez ten router
w wawce. Ping 48-60 ms.
-
3. Data: 2004-02-23 12:22:54
Temat: Re: rozlegle zepsucie tpnet?
Od: Przemyslaw Frasunek <v...@p...na.niusy>
"mathom" <m...@p...pl> napisał(a):
> Mi to wyglada raczej na przycinanie ICMP:
Zgadza sie. Dlatego zcancelowalem, ale zdazyles odpisac :)
--
* Fido: 2:480/124 ** WWW: http://www.frasunek.com/ ** NICHDL: PMF9-RIPE *
* JID: v...@j...atman.pl ** PGP ID: 2578FCAD ** HAM-RADIO: SQ8JIV *