Re: Tablet-android vs. windows 8.1 - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

eGospodarka.pl › Grupy › pl.misc.telefonia.gsm › Tablet-android vs. windows 8.1 › Re: Tablet-android vs. windows 8.1

Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!agh.edu.pl!news.agh.edu.pl!newsfeed2.atman.pl!newsfeed.
atman.pl!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!feeder1.cambriu
musenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com
!newshosting.com!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!unt-exc-01.news.neostrada.pl!unt-spo-a-0
1.news.neostrada.pl!news.neostrada.pl.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 18:42:53 +0200
From: Grzegorz Jablonski <m...@i...com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: pl.misc.telefonia.gsm
Subject: Re: Tablet-android vs. windows 8.1
References: <534c131e$0$2361$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<20140415122038.0de60a41@babcia-workstation>
<534d5586$0$2245$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<lijrf7$stf$3@node2.news.atman.pl>
<534e041a$0$2149$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<limflc$9u0$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <lirc9t$i41$1@dont-email.me>
<liu4a7$au4$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
<5352adf6$0$2372$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<liudu2$kmo$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
<5369139c$0$2156$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<lkb7tf$ktr$1@node2.news.atman.pl>
<5369cfa6$0$2240$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<lklpth$3a4$1@node2.news.atman.pl>
<536f4650$0$2159$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<lknqoa$tkk$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
In-Reply-To: <lknqoa$tkk$1@node1.news.atman.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <536fa88d$0$2158$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
Organization: Telekomunikacja Polska
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.22.51.59
X-Trace: 1399826574 unt-rea-a-02.news.neostrada.pl 2158 83.22.51.59:35527
X-Complaints-To: a...@n...neostrada.pl
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.misc.telefonia.gsm:1057259
[ ukryj nagłówki ]
On 05/11/2014 02:33 PM, Eneuel Leszek Ciszewski wrote:
>
> OE (Outlook Express) ma swój słownik ortograficzny.
> Niby można go uzupełniać, ale IMO nie dorzuciłem słowa 'pokuj'.

http://sjp.pwn.pl/haslo.php?id=2503681