eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

eGospodarka.plGrupypl.comp.pecetDysk SSD jako systemowy C:\ - czy to dobry pomysł?Re: Dysk SSD jako systemowy C:\ - czy to dobry pomysł?
  • Data: 2010-02-14 21:11:50
    Temat: Re: Dysk SSD jako systemowy C:\ - czy to dobry pomysł?
    Od: Michal Kawecki <k...@o...px> szukaj wiadomości tego autora
    [ pokaż wszystkie nagłówki ]

    Dnia Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:29:56 +0100, Latet napisał(a):

    >> Ręczny partition alignment jest w przypadku XP i SSD niezbędny.
    >
    > A jak się to robi? Czym? I kiedy (spod Windows?).
    > Czym jest ten partition aligment w ogóle? Czym się różni od normalnego
    > podzielenia dysku na partycje?

    Bez problemu wykonasz to spod BootIt (sorry za przydługi cytat autora
    programu):

    "Info for new drives with 4K sectors and WD "Advanced Formatting"

    For some reason many users are thinking there is something special about
    these new drives with internal 4K sectors and that they require advanced
    formatting" to function properly. Let me just nip it in the bud now -
    this is mainly marketing BS.

    This should all be obvious to anyone with basic knowledge of drives/file
    systems and the link. Here's some simple brief information:

    What's the deal with the 4K sectors?

    A sector is the smallest unit/block of data a drive can transfer. A
    traditional hard drive has used 512 byte sectors and the plan to change
    to a larger internal sector size has been in the works for years and
    now there are drives that are using 4K sectors. The larger sector
    sizes allow there to be more data on the same platter because there is
    a gap between each sector (including the ECC data). These drives are
    still fully compatibly with all existing software and operating systems
    because they (properly) provide a 512 byte sector view and internally
    handle read/writing in 4K chunks using read-modify-write. With proper
    caching technology (built into the drive) the affects of this should be
    negligible on typical desktops.

    What about this alignment stuff?

    Alignment has to do with where the partitions and data are located on
    the drive. Obviously the "optimal" location is where all data to be
    read/written are contained in the least number of sectors; however, it's
    marketed simply as aligning partitions to the size of a sector (or block
    for devices not using sectors). The reality is you may have a more
    optimal configuration or setup if the partitions are not aligned to the
    size of a sector - what matters is where and how IO occurs on the drive
    which is dependant on the applications (including OS) use of data, file
    system in use, the file system driver implementation, and any cache
    manager implementation.

    On the application side of things, one given is the OS paging file which
    can be heavily used by the OS. The OS will read/write an entire page
    which is 4096 bytes (4K) so having that file aligned to a sector size is
    probably the biggest single alignment factor on a typical desktop
    computer. For that file to be aligned, the clusters of the file system
    need to be aligned (see below). While we're talking about the page
    file, if your file system cluster size is < 4K you'd also want to ensure
    that the page file is not fragmented or that could affect performance as
    well.

    For the file systems, NTFS clusters (allocation units) occur starting at
    the start of a partition so if that partition is aligned on a sector
    size, so will a cluster. For FAT the data may not be aligned even if
    the partition is aligned on a sector size. However, you can use BootIt
    Next Generation (BING) to format a FAT/FAT32 partition using "align for
    NTFS" which will be aligned; you can also use BING to align an existing
    FAT/FAT32 partition using its "slide" / "align for NTFS only" option.
    BING is located at
    http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/bootit-next-generat
    ion.htm

    However, even if a cluster is sector aligned, it doesn't mean the file
    system driver is going to read/write entire clusters at a time (in fact
    that would normally be a waste of time and slow file access way down).
    The only time you will see that is if either the file system driver is
    poorly implemented, or for security the writes on newly allocated
    clusters are zero padded (to end of new cluster) for security.

    Another factor is a cache manager. If this cache manager reads or
    writes entire clusters (or multiple of clusters) then having a cluster
    aligned with a sector size will be optimal for the cache manager and
    hence anything that uses it.

    What's the bottom line on alignment and Windows?

    Due to the cache manager and paging file it's probably best that you
    align your partitions (particularly on heavy used servers/systems). You
    can use BootIt Next Generation to align your new or existing partitions
    by enabling its Align 2048 setting (you should also disable Align on
    End, enable Align MBR End HS - see manual for details at
    http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/support-bootit-next
    -generation.htm )
    before creating the partition or before using its slide (move) option to
    move the partition location.

    However, if your partitions are not aligned or you don't want to align
    them then simply don't worry about it because the system will continue
    to function. If you find that the performance is not as expected then
    align them at your convenience to see if that was the cause of your
    performance issues."
    --
    M. [Windows Desktop Experience MVP]
    /odpowiadając na priv zmień px na pl/
    https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Michal.Kaw
    ecki

Podziel się

Poleć ten post znajomemu poleć

Wydrukuj ten post drukuj

Najnowsze wątki z tej grupy


Najnowsze wątki

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1

Wpisz nazwę miasta, dla którego chcesz znaleźć jednostkę ZUS.

Wzory dokumentów

Bezpłatne wzory dokumentów i formularzy.
Wyszukaj i pobierz za darmo: