Cześć pawell32
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:46:19 +0100 w <news:4b6767bf$1@news.home.net.pl>
napisałeś:

> sky testował mecz w 3d.
> ciekawe jaka to odległa przyszłość?

znalazłem tez takie zestawienie (żadna wyrocznia, w końcu wiele
wynalazków teoretycznie nie miało prawa się przyjąć, a jednak :)

Ten Reasons Why 3D TV May Fail

Will we all watch 3D TV in the future, or will it remain a niche product
meant for science fiction movies, video games, or special sporting
events? As we've seen with the breakout success of the movie Avatar,
there is definitely consumer willingness to enjoy 3D at the movies. But,
it is still an open question whether consumers will buy a 3D experience
for the home. Here are ten reasons why in-home 3D TV may never achieve
mass market appeal.
1. Glasses
need I say more. Who wants to buy them, keep track of them, or even wear
them? Are you eager to wear geeky 3D glasses and sit silently in front
of a TV in a darkened room every night?
2. TV Watching is Social
Home TV watching is in many ways a social experience. You watch with
your family or friends with the lights on. You may talk about the show
or something else. Multitaskers may even be on the Internet, chatting,
tweeting or texting from their phone. 3D viewing abruptly alters the
social nature of TV watching.
3. Compatibility
Think the brand new flat panel TV you bought recently will show 3D?
Think again. You will need to upgrade just about everything including
the cables.
4. Lack of content
Even if you are fortunate enough to buy a 3D TV when they first come
out, along with a 3D Blu-ray player, you won't have much to watch. Even
if you could watch more, what do you really have to watch in 3D?
5. Confusion
3D adds a new layer of complexity to the already complicated TV,
satellite/cable, dvd player hook-up process. New technical 3D jargon
will further confuse consumers. There are currently different ways to
capture and displa y 3D, which can require different types of glasses
and/or equipment. Confused yet? So am I.
6. Health risks
3D viewing can induce headaches, disorientation, nausea, or eye-strain
for some people. 3D tricks the brain and puts your eyes through a
serious workout. Nobody knows yet, since there have been no major
studies what, if any, long-term effects extensive 3D watching may cause.
7. Unwatchable 3D Footage
3D video is unwatchable without special glasses. If you were told right
now your TV would only work if you wore special glasses, how many of
those TVs do you think would sell? Admittedly that is an untrue example,
but it's still the same question consumers will answer with their purse
strings.
8. Just Good-enough Syndrome
This is not a disease, but many peopl e are quite happy with their new
flat panel TV purchase of recent years. At the same time everything is
not yet broadcast in full HD and the majority are still happy with
regular DVD quality. Even the blu-ray market has yet to take off.
Convincing consumers to adopt a new format may be a tough sell.
9. Discs are dying
No funerals please. With improved streaming capabilities and greater
digital home storage, inevitably discs (cd, dvd and blu-ray) will be
replaced with on-demand streaming. It may take another decade, but how
we consume media will likely not include discs. This isn't necessarily
bad for 3D, but it takes 2-4 times more storage and greater download
speeds to stream 3D. Bandwidth limitations are likely to be an issue.
10. History Lessons
Bringing sweeping change to home TV watching takes time, a very long
time. It took HDTV about 20 years to achieve market dominance with the
help of a government mandate. For better or worse, I don't expect
government involvement this time. The electronics and entertainment
industries will have their work cut out for them.
--
Pozdrawiam,
Marek
Na początku był chaos i tak już zostało...