Dnia 08.01.2008 Marcin J. Kowalczyk <k...@k...kom> napisał/a:
>>> taka zagranice jak w gtse to ja serdecznie.... nie mam juz sily
>>> tlumaczyc klientom ze lada chwila bedzie nowe lacze.
>>
>> Odświeżę wątek. Jeśli w GTS ssie zagranica w Netii padaka a w TP słaba
>> obsługa, to od kogo proponujecie wziąść łącze ?
>
> na chwile obecna to chyba tylko exatel.
mam wglad do takiego jednego malego lacza na exatelu w poznaniu. i dla
porownania inne lacze rowniez w poznaniu, ale z mana+acx (wyjscie na swiat
przez telie, acx-em wraca czesc polski - opoznienia na samym ac-xie w
okolicy 15ms - radio):

google.com:

exatel:
64 bytes from mu-in-f99.google.com (209.85.135.99): icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=39.4 ms
64 bytes from mu-in-f99.google.com (209.85.135.99): icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=40.0 ms

man:
64 bytes from ik-in-f147.google.com (66.249.91.147): icmp_seq=1 ttl=246 time=21.1 ms
64 bytes from ik-in-f147.google.com (66.249.91.147): icmp_seq=2 ttl=246 time=22.1 ms
(do ip ktory dostaje exatel):
64 bytes from 209.85.135.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.135.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=31.4 ms

a.nasza-klasa.pl
exatel:
64 bytes from papaserw.nasza-klasa.pl (89.149.195.248): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=41.5
ms
64 bytes from papaserw.nasza-klasa.pl (89.149.195.248): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=44.1
ms

man:
64 bytes from papaserw.nasza-klasa.pl (89.149.195.248): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=35.3
ms
64 bytes from papaserw.nasza-klasa.pl (89.149.195.248): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=34.0
ms

onet.pl:
exatel:
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=23.0 ms
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=23.4 ms

man:
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=22.0 ms
64 bytes from f1virt.onet.pl (213.180.130.200): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=22.4 ms

wp.pl:
exatel:
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=2 ttl=120 time=26.4 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=3 ttl=120 time=22.6 ms

man:
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=12.5 ms
64 bytes from www.wp.pl (212.77.100.101): icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=14.7 ms

yahoo.com:
exatel:
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=202 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=203 ms

man:
64 bytes from f1.us.www.vip.ird.yahoo.com (87.248.113.14): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54
time=40.8 ms
64 bytes from f1.us.www.vip.ird.yahoo.com (87.248.113.14): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54
time=39.5 ms
(a do ip ktory dostal exatel)
64 bytes from 66.94.234.13: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=182 ms
64 bytes from 66.94.234.13: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=175 ms

poczta.fm:
exatel:
64 bytes from www.poczta.fm (217.74.64.235): icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=32.0 ms
64 bytes from www.poczta.fm (217.74.64.235): icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=31.1 ms

man:
64 bytes from www.poczta.fm (217.74.64.235): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from www.poczta.fm (217.74.64.235): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=16.1 ms


dns2.exatel.pl:
exatel:
64 bytes from dns2.exatel.pl (213.172.186.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=25.4 ms
64 bytes from dns2.isp.telenergo.pl (213.172.186.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=62 time=23.1 ms

man:
64 bytes from dns2.exatel.pl (213.172.186.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=26.2 ms
64 bytes from dns2.isp.telenergo.pl (213.172.186.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=25.3 ms

rose.man.poznan.pl:
exatel:
64 bytes from rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3): icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=5.37 ms
64 bytes from rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3): icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=6.31 ms

man:
64 bytes from rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3): icmp_seq=1 ttl=251 time=4.86 ms
64 bytes from rose.man.poznan.pl (150.254.173.3): icmp_seq=2 ttl=251 time=4.71 ms

gaja.tpnet.pl:
exatel:
64 bytes from gaja.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.20): icmp_seq=1 ttl=122 time=25.9 ms
64 bytes from gaja.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.20): icmp_seq=2 ttl=122 time=25.2 ms

man:
64 bytes from gaja.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.20): icmp_seq=1 ttl=120 time=10.4 ms
64 bytes from gaja.tpnet.pl (217.98.20.20): icmp_seq=2 ttl=120 time=9.78 ms


W skrócie - jeżeli chodzi o czasy - nie ma się czym w exatelu podniecać ;)

W obu przypadkach czasy do bramki operatora w okolicy 2-3ms

--
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała
Linux && Unix && Network administrator
PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: u...@p...net e-mail: a...@d...name