On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:52:41 +0000 (UTC), Lukasz Trabinski napisał:
>
> Ciekawe, że nikt nie zauważył
>
> oceanic:~$ host -a tpnet.pl |grep AAAA
> ns1.tpnet.pl. 18010 IN AAAA 2a01:1700:2:1::3264
> ns2.tpnet.pl. 18010 IN AAAA 2a01:1700:3:2::3296
> ns3.tpnet.pl. 23864 IN AAAA 2a01:1700:2:3::32c8
>
> oceanic:~$ ping6 -c 3 ns1.tpnet.pl
> PING ns1.tpnet.pl(2a01:1700:2:1::3264) 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 2a01:1700:2:1::3264: icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=68.5 ms
> 64 bytes from 2a01:1700:2:1::3264: icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=67.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 2a01:1700:2:1::3264: icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=68.8 ms
>
> --- ns1.tpnet.pl ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2071ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 67.908/68.429/68.805/0.380 ms

Tylko czasy jakieś długie. Bardzo...

[verox@matrix ~]$ ping6 -c 3 ns1.tpnet.pl
PING ns1.tpnet.pl(2a01:1700:2:1::3264) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2a01:1700:2:1::3264: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=152 ms
64 bytes from 2a01:1700:2:1::3264: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 2a01:1700:2:1::3264: icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=151 ms

--- ns1.tpnet.pl ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 151.837/152.023/152.273/0.367 ms, pipe 2
[verox@matrix ~]$ ping -c3 ns1.tpnet.pl
PING ns1.tpnet.pl (80.50.50.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ns1.tpnet.pl (80.50.50.100): icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=8.07 ms
64 bytes from ns1.tpnet.pl (80.50.50.100): icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=8.48 ms
64 bytes from ns1.tpnet.pl (80.50.50.100): icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=7.56 ms

--- ns1.tpnet.pl ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.562/8.041/8.485/0.391 ms, pipe 2


--
[tomek <at> sikornik <dot> net] vy 73! de SP9UOB
Proud to be 100 percent microsoft free. op. Tomek